Login / Register
D
o
v
e
r
.uk.com
News
Forums
Dover Forum
General Discussion Forum
Politics Forum
Archive Updates
Channel Swimming Forum
Doverforum.com: Sea News
Channel Swimming
History Archive
Calendar
Channel Traffic
If this post contains material that is offensive, inappropriate, illegal, or is a personal attack towards yourself, please report it using the form at the end of this page.
All reported posts will be reviewed by a moderator.
The post you are reporting:
The seat reduction was a Conservative manifesto pledge Ross.
I understand what you say about reducing the Commons further, but because the Executive is taken largely from The Commons, a smaller number of seats would simply increase the power of the executive at the expense of backbenchers. I think, for that reason, a reduction of 50 is about right.
Do the maths:
600 seats - a government majority would be 301.
The payroll vote of Ministers/Junior Ministers/Whips etc would be over a third of that, about 100+.
Reduce the number of seats to 500, majority 251 - a payroll vote of 100+ - that leaves just 150 government backbenchers many of whom will be eager to suck up in the hope of future Ministerial appointments. There is not a lot of room left for the good old back-bench maverick and rebel that we need in a legislature.
Report Post
Your Name
Reason
end link