• The post you are reporting:
   
  Thanks Phil, that makes interesting reading. Over the period featured in the figures shown in that link, the income and expenditure is showing a surplus of just under £600,000. I appreciate that I know nothing about this charity, and I respect both Roger and Sue as Trustees to do their best, but surely £600,000 could do a lot of good - isn't this how the money was intended, rather than sitting in a bank account.
  
  I agree with the previous postings that secrecy shouldn't be how any charity operates; secrecy engenders mistrust and the old adage that 'if there is nothing untoward, why is it kept secret?'.

Report Post

Your Name

Reason