Login / Register
D
o
v
e
r
.uk.com
News
Forums
Dover Forum
General Discussion Forum
Politics Forum
Archive Updates
Channel Swimming Forum
Doverforum.com: Sea News
Channel Swimming
History Archive
Calendar
Channel Traffic
If this post contains material that is offensive, inappropriate, illegal, or is a personal attack towards yourself, please report it using the form at the end of this page.
All reported posts will be reviewed by a moderator.
The post you are reporting:
Alex has some good Points. The graffiti must be dealt with and so must the decaying, often dangerous brickwork. I've said since 1991, and others have agreed that the best way to deter vandalism and other unsocial behaviour on the Heights would be to open up the ditches so there were no hiding places.
The problem with these proposals or suggestions, sterling stuff that they are, is that there is no money. The WHPS (myself included) have spent many hours cutting foliage back, as has the also-underfunded WCCP. It is at the worst a losing battle, at best an almost depressing undertaking for any volunteer force.
That's not to mention the miles of 'red tape' involved with permanent works, ie, pointing bricks.
Which brings us back nicely to the main subject (I think!) of this thread:
A Blanket No lets the status quo carry on ad-infinitum, whereas a 'suck it and see' approach potentially raises all kinds of possibilities !
Thank you for your attention.
Report Post
Your Name
Reason
end link