Hi Jeff.
Good post, but the answer is a blanket no from me.
No housing on Western Heights, no housing on Farthingloe.
If you look at it, Jeff, it wouldn't make sense, either. This is the case:
Suppose you need so and so much money to repair so and so much on Western Heights. So you spend the money on repairing/maintaining the Napoleonic defences as far as the money goes. That's fine.
But does it make sense to spend so much more money on building houses there, in order to repair or maintain the historical defences? No, it evidently doesn't!
By building houses there, society would be spending a lot more money. and for something totally unrelated to Napoleonic defences..
It's as if I urgently need £5 to buy milk bread and sugar. Suppose I do not have the £5. So, rather then obtain £5, I go and buy a computer, which quite obviously I couldn't afford either, and which I don't need, as I already have one.
I convince myself that in this way, by spending £400 on a computer, I can also afford the £5 for the milk, coffee and sugar. NO, doesn't make sense!
We don't need more houses on Western Heights, we're not short of houses in Dover, and DDC already plan to build 6,000 of them in Whitfield; we haven't got money to repair Napoleonic defences, and yet we should build 700 houses on W.H. and at Farthingloe, so as to repair the defences...
No, doesn't make sense to me either!
