• The post you are reporting:
   
  EH and DDC are the primary stakeholders here. It is far more progressive to attempt to enter into a constructive dialogue with these bodies and negotiate and discuss a future direction than railing off angry accusatory letters and petitions. All this will do is close doors that need to remain open if there is to be any future for the Heights. This does not mean one has to accept carte-blanche whatever proposals are fed down, but approaches and discussions have to be made in a sensible, mature and reasonable manner.
  
  At no point has Paul stated he is pro-CGI, that has been made clear again and again. There are simply not enough guarantees from CGI about securing investment in the heritage to responsibly assume that stance from a heritage angle. Recognising latent potential in their proposals for heritage preservation does not necessarily make for a pro-stance; but not being in the anti-category does not consequently make for a pro-position. The whole issue is not black and white.

Report Post

Your Name

Reason