The post you are reporting:
Paul, another point discussed was something I brought up somewhere at the start of this topic, possibly on this thread or a related thread, and at the time it was addressed to you, as I hoped to make you aware of something you may have overlooked from the start.
Anyway, it was brought up today at the meeting by other members, and you were also mentioned. It is believed that any promise made by developers to repair/upgrade elements of the Heights would result in broken promises, and possibly law-suits, with lawyers getting the money at the end, and not Western Heights.
Covenants are not binding under English Law.
I may go one day and search for my original piece, and indicate it's location, if it's on this thread.