The post you are reporting:
Alex, I was merely sad that you had said you'd post no more on this thread and so would leave it before it got to 1000 posts.
I've followed this thread since its outset, have read all the CGI documentation, read the outline planning application and all associated paperwork, gone back up on the heights to the areas with which I'm most familiar to see how the plans would fit on the ground, read the DDC LDF, DDC additional corporate strategy, made myself aware of the financila benefits to DDC of additional houses, etc. So I'm not exactly unfamiliar with the points that you make re the new homes bonus fund and so on.
From all that I've read, I don't believe that Paul is necessarily wholeheartedly, or even halfheartedly, in favour of the CGI proposal and he's certainly not been campaigning to see it adopted.
I am a great fan of the landmark fortresses and fortifications that 2000 years as a military garrison town have left in Dover, Paul is passionate about them. I would like to see these fortifications preserved and improved so that they can be accessed by visitors all the time and not just on special one off occasions. Many others want to see this as well, Napoleonic buffs more than anyone else.
I am not getting involved in this discussion on one side or the other of the CGI debate because at this time I have no substantial alternatives to offer that will preserve the heritage for posterity.