Howard, this simply does not make sense.
I posed, not for the first time, an essential question, and have never confused WHPS with developers, and have also specifically recognised their hard work as volunteers.
You have presented a weakness in arguments there, as quite clearly, an important question of public interest is not being answered by people advocating in front line the building of 700 odd houses, hotel and conference centre on two protected areas.
Rather than say how much money they think is needed, and for what kind of works, and for which results, it is all come down to reproaching me for these intelligent questions and implying I've been stating things which quite clearly I have never stated, neither here nor on any other public domain!
As far as I'm concerned, you have all lost the argument there, and have degenerated into presenting me in a different light.
This is verging on to press-ganging and avoiding answering the most essential of questions. I shall withdraw from this thread most final
