The post you are reporting:
Peter, it's up to Paul to make up his mind as he feels fit.
In all this process of commenting on the proposed developments, I have never used the personal negative comments towards the proponents of the plans but which have been expressed by some towards me, including Roger Walkden, who wrote that may-be Dover is not a town for me, and that I am trying to make Dover become a backwards town ... Such comments are not befitting in a public debate on an issue that is object of public consultation.
Chris' last comment, which I mentioned, is particularly nasty, it is offensive!
It seems, though, a message to anyone who tries to challenge the proposed developments, and THAT is what concerns me more. It is an attempt to condition people's response to DDC Planning, and this needed addressing.
Personally I am not prone to intimidation, but others may be.
I say this also because my expressed views are similar to those of Lorraine, who has already mentioned in her last post that she was not happy with the bullying going on towards opponents of the development plans.
As for my article, I perceive it to be right, it is not a deliberate attempt at libel. If I considered it to be so, I'd have changed it accordingly.
It uses the word: currently.
At the time of writing that word, that was my perception, and still is.