The post you are reporting:
Paul - Yet more personal attacks - your facetious remarks (#538) this time over my book, Haunted Dover. This has been stocked by the WCCP, Dover Museum and is available at WH Smiths - it is also a best seller.
One of the main features is that I give account of local legends in their historic context - I am, after all a local historian with regular contributions published in the Dover Mercury for the last nine years as well as academically respected articles and book - Banking on Dover - to my credit.
However, it is evident you have not read Haunted Dover by your comment on the Braddon story ... may I suggest that you do?
Second I note that in posting #523, regarding CGI that you, "helped do the cashflow statement for one if their startup companies" as a trainee at an accountant.
That being the case, then you can answer my question, taken from CGI Company report:
When the Sites were transferred to the Company the Company made use of an Inland Revenue APPROVED (my capitals) Stamp Duty scheme. There is a possibility that this could be retrospectively be withdrawn in which case the Company would incur an obligation to pay stamp duty of £680,000. What is meant by APPROVED?
Finally, Howard, I agree with Stuart (#545), the larger population of Dover do not know what is going on with regards to Western Heights and Farthingloe - and the danger they are in. That is hardly surprising as the subject is only being discussed, in any depth, on the Forum
Albeit, even here one has to put up with continual personal attacks that have now put me off making any more contributions.
Lorraine