• The post you are reporting:
   
  I endorse everything you say Alexander and I take it that the personal attacks on both of us are because those who support the CGI proposal of desecrating the:
  
  i. the National Monument of Western Heights with mixed social and other style of housing and a hotel - when we have more than sufficient conference facilities IN the town and our local guest houses are feeling the pinch
  
  and the
  
  ii. Arthurian Farthingloe Valley, again with mixed social and other style of housing and sundry facilities
  
  are beginning to realise that they are fast becoming a minority supported only by the council, excouncillors et al.
  
  Along with Lara, both Alexander and I agree that the proposed developments serve no benefit for Dover other than:
  
  - Providing council tax to DDC, and
  
  - For DDC to get rid of Western Heights landholdings that were inherited from the former Dover Corporation - who had acquired them to use as landfill for the town's rubbish.
  
  This view, as my post bag shows, is shared by a lot of locals.
  
  As Paul has e-mail contact with CGI's Rob Prince, could you (Paul) ask him to clarify four points for me?
  
  1. Assuming from that are no longer shareholders of CGI (from what is implied in his posting # 513) were Rufus Pearl, David Pearl, Pearl Investment Management Services Ltd and Dungarvan Associates related enterprises?
  
  2. PRC - who were they?
  
  3. Why have the original investors dropped out?
  
  4. This is taken from CGI Company report:
  When the Sites were transferred to the Company the Company made use of an Inland Revenue APPROVED (my capitals) Stamp Duty scheme. There is a possibility that this could be retrospectively be withdrawn in which case the Company would incur an obligation to pay stamp duty of £680,000. Can Rob Prince explain what is meant by APPROVED?
  
  Lorraine

Report Post

Your Name

Reason