The post you are reporting:
Paul, you have been given on this thread my point of view, that funding be applied for that would enable a contract on the part of a preservation-related organisation to employ workers for preserving the Western Heights ex-military structural deposits.
I noted that, if a worker received £25,000 a year, 40 workers would cost £1 million.
If a general repairs mission were to last 2 years, that would be £2 million.
Add a few hundred thousand pounds for materials such as scaffolding and transport.
Once the general repairs are done, a few workers could still be employed full time for grass-cutting etc.
As you reject this, you then conclude that my proposal is to let it all fall down.
Anyone reading my previous comments on this thread will see you have proven yourself wrong on this conclusion.
Paul, if someone has different views to yours, does this give you the capacity to sum their views up in a totally opposite manner?
You have already proven yourself wrong in your judgments a few times on this thread, by simple giving a wrong interpretation of someone else's views and proposals.