• The post you are reporting:
   
  Alexander, time and time and time again all of us have made it abundantly clear that everyone's individual and corporate submissions with regard to the DHB proposals are treated in exactly the same way. No one has made any statement or suggested that it was otherwise except for yourself.
  
  However, the fact remains that the only alternative vision (aside from the status quo) for the future governance and ownership structure of the port that has been fully costed and which has developed and tested a full business plan as well as demonstrating widespread and significant levels of support from across the District and beyond is the DPPT's.
  
  As far as the submissions to the DfT on the DHB proposals are concerned, each and every submission is treated equally. As far as the long term future of the port is concerned, the only costed, financially backed and planned out alternative will inevitably influence the final disposition of the port's governance and ownership once the DHB have been dismissed. Don't forget that the only offer to buy the port that is in the public domain has come from DPPT and that offer still stands.

Report Post

Your Name

Reason