Dover.uk.com
If this post contains material that is offensive, inappropriate, illegal, or is a personal attack towards yourself, please report it using the form at the end of this page.

All reported posts will be reviewed by a moderator.
  • The post you are reporting:
     
    # 66........Hot air....

    The mess with Labour and the unions makes this the perfect time to let the state fund political parties

    It's easy to state the case against state funding. But if the lack of respect for MPs is what prevents

    taxpayers stumping up, this lack owes a lot to the present system

    Not for the first time, a still, small voice of sanity from John Prescott. Scarcely noticed amid the

    echoing roars of recrimination during the weekend, over Ed Miliband's collision with Unite's

    leader Len McCluskey, the Labour peer renewed his call for state funding of political parties

    on the grounds that "whether it is a rich union or a rich businessman, in parties they should not

    be dictating what they think is the position".

    Prescott understands better than most one of the paradoxes of the years he lived through as

    Deputy Prime Minister. No Labour leader before or since took less account of the view of union

    leaders than Tony Blair - probably rather less than Prescott himself would have liked.

    But at the same time, remarkably little was done during the Blair years to reform the unions'

    institutional leverage in the party.

    It's hardly Blair's doing that Ed Miliband didn't see earlier that exactly because of the role played

    by the unions in his own election as leader, he would be under mounting pressure to put in train

    some of the reforms he is expected to foreshadow in his big speech today. Or that Labour has not

    found the additional funding - including from business - that it was so adept at attracting

    during the Blair years.

Report Post

 
end link