• The post you are reporting:
   
  Sorry, Keith, I disagree with your first statement. People who try to do the unpopular thing of actually addressing issues that will change things rather than simply agree with the bang em up Sun "readers" are often labelled as "do-gooders" which absolves people from the need to properly examine the real issues and maybe change their minds. I have asked this before: what is the alternative to a "do-gooder"? A "do-badder"? I know what I prefer. In fact, a few more do-gooders would help - a few more people with the guts to challenge the perceived view and take a stand. Doing good does not equate to being soft - my experience is that those who really do try to change things meaningfully are considerably braver and stronger than those who take the easy way of simply agreeing with the thoughtless majority.

Report Post

Your Name

Reason