• The post you are reporting:
   
  It was only the Portacabin that was retrospective Sheila.
  
  I believe you are mis-informed Sheila; planning and building control are different issues and different departments.
  
  Retrospective means just that, that the object of the application has been actioned before planning permission has been granted - not refused, but granted. That is why this retrospective application had not broken any rules, because permission had not been granted or refused.
  If permission had not been granted, then he would have (broken the rules) and enforcement would have followed to have it removed.
  
  Keith - going back on one of your comments, it is only when an application is dealt with fully by the Planning Officers and decided by them under "delegated powers" that you can rightly say that the officers decide, other than that, the Planning Committee members decide.
  I am sure that the planning department have an idea of your view of them, but I doubt that they know that you and Reg think that only rich people get permission - that amounts to saying they takes bribes and if that is what you mean, why not come out and say so ?
  
  I am happy to send your's and Reg's comments about Rich people to the legal team at DDC to see what their view is. Libel can be very expensive.
  
  
  
  
  Roger

Report Post

Your Name

Reason