The post you are reporting:
Roger, I'm referring to how Barry explains that cuts have to be introduced into society, while the super-rich are suposed to be untouchables, those with private assets that resemble a state-budget. (I'm not talking about company, but private-individual assets).
At that rate, only a rift can appear in society, no matter what definition one uses, "big society" or other.
It's where compromising starts to end, because Barry's views on the super-rich on one side, who are untouchables, and the vast part of society on the other who must bear with cuts without end, only lead to this one result: that which I posted above.
