The post you are reporting:
Keith, "because we did nothing", what is this supposed to mean?
Are you, per chance, suggesting it is OK to support terrorists in Syria who teach fanatics from half the world to make bombs, detonate them among civilians, and murder civilians and prisoners of war, while deliberately transforming towns and cities into battlegrounds?
Perhaps you are unaware that security chiefs in Britain and other countries are concerned that these terrorists will come back and implement what they have learned.
So by supporting them, as Hague would like, we would be assuring ourselves a future of terrorism at home, as well as destroying another country.
Incidentally, the reason given by the Egyptian military for deposing the elected president there was his decision to support the Jihadists in Syria.
It appears he was spurred into this decision by the "friends of Syria" meeting, involving top ministers/sheiks of 11 countries, including Britain and Egypt.
Hague had pushed for arming the rebels.
The majority of Egyptians will have nothing to do with it.
Likewise, the majority of Brits don't want our involvement in supporting terrorists or rebels in Syria.
The example you give about " if London gets bombed" if we don't support terrorists, is grotesque!