• The post you are reporting:
   
  VIC
  You are aware monies were set asided for a play area in priory, sites were found and then again once rogers lot took over asked roger to look at the sites again as some were more approving tody than years ago, this to my knowledge didnt happen.
  further i was happy to discuss anytime with roger the sites, or ideas he may have had, this to was never taken up.
  
  the money was in the DDC budget to be spent in priory, but instead it went into the general coffers of DDC so cannot agree it went to a good cause.
  
  although the play areas are an issue within themselves, the priory play area is one that should be high on the agenda of all political parties priory has lost out so many times it's payback time.
  
  just on the 106 agreement we bneed to grasp what was said at the time
  
  firstly develpers were asked to allow community use within a play area they were to provide all rejected this.
  
  some stated they would provide monies(top was £20,000)which wouuldnt pay for much and would have to be another site in ward.
  
  the 106 agreement also put off developers who didnt want to eat into there profits.
  
  so not only did priory not get a play area, it also didnt get the developement, and didnt a say on where the coffers should be spent in priory
  
  hopoefully this can be looked at again

Report Post

Your Name

Reason