• The post you are reporting:
   
  Well done Ted. It is the 'potential' claimants endurance that is tested from the off. [Isn't it funny how, when one has endured the process of claiming, one is stuck with the designation "claimant" and not (deserving) recipient?]
  There seems to be something of a 'contest' between doctors who are charged with ordering ones health issues and doctors who are there to ensure that ones health needs do not impinge upon the public purse through the benefit system.
  How many of the "deserving recipients" are not under the care of a GP or Hospital Specialist?
  Why is it that one short consultation trumps the considered opinion of experienced, trained (fellow) professionals?
  
  It all seems to be something of a political game. Where one Government can cloak a section of the population and another Government can then reveal them, but why must it always be the fault of the individual?
  
  I cannot shake-off the idea that the population is farmed by successive Governments and not in a true partnership.

Report Post

Your Name

Reason