Guest 725- Registered: 7 Oct 2011
- Posts: 1,418
#1
From today's Telegraph:
......"It is understood the Prime Minister is considering new rules that would oblige websites hosting such videos to introduce robust age verification systems similar to those used to safeguard children online gambling".
Oh dear isn't it time someone explained how the internet works? It's not just a UK internet you know.
Keith Sansum1
- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,948
#2
it's not the only thing he knows not much about, and hes the king of u turns
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
#3
silver spoon in the cake hole dave and george will never understand what goes on in the real world.
a couple of years back the former blamed deals on stella artois for binge drinking.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,948
#4
i nthink we should have a compititon who can guess what cameron will u turn on next
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 725- Registered: 7 Oct 2011
- Posts: 1,418
#5
The trouble is that David Cameron is quite simply hopeless.
I'm no politician. I'm not a businessman, I'm travelled but not as much as many people but for God's sake give me the job of Prime minister and I'll make a better fist of it than this bloke.
Don't they have some sort of entrance exam before letting amateurs apply for the post?
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,948
#6
oh philip
poor old david hes having a bit of a hard time at mo lo
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 716- Registered: 9 Jun 2011
- Posts: 4,010
#7
Next ...................Big Brothe Law........
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,948
#8
today lib dem president says lib dems will fight the tories on big brother laws
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
#9
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,948
#10
HOWARD;
Even I underestimated how bad things had got for the grass roots lib dems.
Not standing enough candidates(or in some cases none at all) in councils previously hed by the lib dems, has to be a disaster for the lib dems.
Although everyone recognised the lib dems will be destroyed in the commons once the co olition completetly falls apart.
the locals is usually where lib dem local activists worked hard, some clearly at last local elections turned on their leader.
some having held seat for years(sheffield one example) and controlling councils, all wiped out.
it takes a long time to build that following, but looks like the lib dems grass roots have given up.
looking towards dover, lib dems were never strong, highest they ever got was 10 cllrs in a time when, like now the tories were hated.
but they soon lost all those seats to both the other major parties and at the last local elections the final 2 lib dems lost there seats.
Even when there doing well(in shepway) matching the tories, they fall out with each out, and we see a breakaway lib dem party(peoples first party) which split the lib dems down the middle, thus letting the tories in, who built on this and now hold most of the seats in shepway.
so whats the future?
well unless we see more cleggy action to bring together his party he may well be doomed sooner than he thinks.
It's sad after cleggy's tv leaders debate he did well on the night, but then went down hill.
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Brian Dixon
- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
#11
and why not,lets have u-turns on everything while we are about it.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,948
#12
and we probably will
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS