• The post you are reporting:
   
  #46
  Two things on this...
  -I doubt even as things stood prior to 1998 he would have been sent 'home' to face execution.
  -Apart from the deportation issue, is there anything that would have saved the second murder victim?
  
  I am not arguing for the status-quo, but against the idea that one wrong fixes another wrong.
  
  What we, each and all, as citizens must guard against is the assumption that an ill-defined proposal is set to cure one's perceived wrong and create no greater harm.
  The tabloid headlines play upon the MP as the injustice itself plays upon the public (part of which are constituents), but is the proposed fix set to correct the injustice or merely to get the tabloid headlines to favour the MP?
  
  At the core of CE's proposal is the supremacy of Parliament, which is another purely emotive issue, devoid of substance.

Report Post

Your Name

Reason