DT1 you have left out a vital stage of the process, where is your provision for at least 3 groups to hold totally opposing views , based on , well frankly nothing at all .
These groups must be allocated huge ammounts of public funds in order to debate through innuendo and repatition , how many ducks could dance on the head of a pin , and where that pin should be placed whilst a specific type of duck is dancing , or not .
Each debate /rant must be backed up by veiled refrences to what each group knows about each others , political views/private life/ romantic history ( delete as appropriate ) and there absolutley must be public deification of at least one figure head and anything they may or may not have said has to remain unchallenged .
Whilst all this is going on and on and on the river will have dried up and someone will have eaten the ducks, but what does that matter
