The post you are reporting:
Barry, I agree with your general vision of less government and more private/local enterprise.
My second thread on Dover Forum was dedicated to economy, and the need to change the present way in which the economy is governed.
We need less centralisation of government and less centralisation of economic powers, as too much wealth and economic decision-making is in the hands of too few people.
My view then was, and remains, a Constitution that defines basic economic aspects, that must be adhered to. People administering to the goog and sane funtioning of local and national production would ensure that this constitution of economy is abided to.
It would prevent in the future that a government comes along and introduces catastrophic regulations, or continues along the lines of the present disastrous regulations, which have led to massive sovereign debt, annual deficits, unemployment getting worse not better, and more of the same.
This has been my message from the start: we must revise how our economy is governed (administered), and we need LESS big government, less centralisation, less interference from bright sparks (such as T. Blair and others), and of-course, no more of the EUSSR with their myriads of laws and regulations and super-centralisation schemes.
The detail may vary between your views and mine, but the general message is somewhat related.
Also, you might consider that you could publish some online articles with your ideas, there are plenty of writers' sites, and get page-views from all round the world.
I do!