Jan Higgins
- Location: Dover
- Registered: 5 Jul 2010
- Posts: 13,931
#1
I thought I would start yet another new thread for the New Year.
Since when has what I understood to be bisexual been "pansexual" surely they are the same thing. BTW spell checker does not yet know the word.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-50978997-----------------------------------------------------------------------
I try to be neutral and polite but it is hard and getting even more difficult at times.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Weird Granny Slater
- Location: Dover
- Registered: 7 Jun 2017
- Posts: 3,095
#2
Your spell-checker must be the Edwardian version, JH. The word's been around since the 20s, and since the 70s with that specific meaning.
'Pass the cow dung, my dropsy's killing me' - Heraclitus
Captain Haddock
- Location: Marlinspike Hall
- Registered: 8 Oct 2012
- Posts: 8,397
#3
Nah. Means she had sex with Pan.
"The world is still a weird place, despite my efforts to make clear and perfect sense of it".
Dr. Hunter S Thompson
Jan Higgins- Location: Dover
- Registered: 5 Jul 2010
- Posts: 13,931
#4
Just posting this in an effort to keep this group alive, something that is not happening at the moment.
As the saying goes use it or loose it.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-51099102
My personal view is I am fed up hearing about Harry and Meghan, let them live as she seems to want with Harry choosing to agree. If they want privacy let them live more like the rest of us and pay their own way, except for any security issues which I suppose this country must still pay for.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
I try to be neutral and polite but it is hard and getting even more difficult at times.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Keith Sansum1
- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,948
#5
Well I try not to over post
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Jan Higgins- Location: Dover
- Registered: 5 Jul 2010
- Posts: 13,931
#6
Keith Sansum1 wrote:Well I try not to over post
At least you post Keith.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
I try to be neutral and polite but it is hard and getting even more difficult at times.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Brian Dixon
- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
#7
cheesed off hearing about the pair, harry should continue with his royal dutys along with archie or what ever his name is, and mrs Simson be sent to la la land permatly.
Jan Higgins likes this
Sue Nicholas- Location: river
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 6,025
#8
Agree Brian.Let Megan go back and Harry support his Brother.I feel sorry for Kate as she will have to do more.
Guest 2846- Registered: 9 Sep 2018
- Posts: 18
#9
Must be the weather driving us all on here to discuss Harry & Megan... Most people tend to think this is her doing... I think the opposite... either either, let them be .
Reginald Barrington likes this
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,948
#10
Jan
I agree with you on posters
But there has been people asking others not to contribute so much
But I will contribute
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Weird Granny Slater- Location: Dover
- Registered: 7 Jun 2017
- Posts: 3,095
#11
Megs knows how the media works; after all, she has learned from one of its best critics:
'Pass the cow dung, my dropsy's killing me' - Heraclitus
Jan Higgins- Location: Dover
- Registered: 5 Jul 2010
- Posts: 13,931
#12
She certainly knows how to retain that privacy she says she wants.......by immediately getting her picture on FB and thus on the news and TV reports.
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/world/meghan-makes-surprise-visit-to-womens-centre-as-she-breaks-cover-amid-royal-crisis-a4334461.html-----------------------------------------------------------------------
I try to be neutral and polite but it is hard and getting even more difficult at times.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,948
#13
I don't have any strong feelings on the royal families latest issues
I just want to know how much it will cost me!!
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Jan Higgins- Location: Dover
- Registered: 5 Jul 2010
- Posts: 13,931
#14
Not really gossip but as Sue has been very quiet does anyone have any information if she is OK, I certainly hope she is.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
I try to be neutral and polite but it is hard and getting even more difficult at times.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Jan Higgins- Location: Dover
- Registered: 5 Jul 2010
- Posts: 13,931
#15
Still no news about Sue Nicholas, I would have thought someone on here would know if she is OK and simply taking a break from this group.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
I try to be neutral and polite but it is hard and getting even more difficult at times.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
'Pass the cow dung, my dropsy's killing me' - Heraclitus