Neil.Wiggins wrote:Opposition to the dredge is far from universal within the wider community, so supporting the Board in this area and highlighting that a license refusal will delay the project and adversely impact numbers of jobs created and the quantity and quality of the regeneration activity that I (and so many others) have spent so many years pressing for, is hardly ignoring what the wider community may want.
Very worrying that a project on this scale can be so dramatically impacted on an assumption that the Goodwin Sands could be dredged. Usually contingency is equated within succesful project management.
If DHB get their own way it will be very interesting to see if Dover regeneration is impacted by other factors. I think the board have totally underestimated the significance of what they are proposing.
