The post you are reporting:
Of course Barry it has to come from the private sector, that is a fact. But this is about boundaries.
Yes I agree the public sector is inflated (although this is not fact). Inefficient, I also agree but again this is not fact as input (money) is subjectively linked to output, which in the case of the public sector is well being. eg. what use is a work force if it is ill?
We absolutely need the private sector now but previous marches such as the 250,000+ that marched against the severity and more to the point speed of the cuts, suggest we should not persecute the public sector either. I totally agree that the Labour government mismanaged the economy the 'grand correction' being implemented is just creating a gap. There is no way the private sector can accomodate the task it is being handed. My point is that it will not be the CEOs that feel this pain, even if their wages are cut by half, but it is the person on average wage. In much the same way we subsidise the Rail compnaies but it is us that pay their bonuses.
On top of this we hear cries of defence for the CEOs and bankers saying that they will leave our country if we do not let them do what they like.
I would actually like to see a Britain where we didn't need to have a public sector as it would mean we were all able to provide everything for ourselves but the simple fact is that we can't. Simply look at the average wage for a married couple; look at the mortgage of a 2 bedroom house in Dover; look at the cost of sending 2 children to a private school; heating the house and feeding the family. It's quite simple that the private sector relies on the public and the public is over inflated because of cost and situations created by the private. It's symbiosis and boundaries.
As for spite, no, I just don't like a system that facilitates such inequality (that's opinion not fact). And envy, I actually like people with money (they always throw great parties) but money has never been my motivation, just something that is a requirement.