Bedroom tax legal challenge dismissed by high court
"Two judges ruled that courts should not "micromanage" policy decisions
and that the provision of discretionary housing payments granted local authorities enough flexibility to deal with shortfalls in rent....
...However in their ruling, Lord Justice Law and Justice Cranston came down strongly against the secretary of state for failing to set down other regulations following from a previous housing benefit challenge to payments made to families with disabled children in the private sector.
In that case in March last year, judges found that size criteria for housing benefit in the private sector could discriminate against disabled children who needed a bedroom each because of their health needs.
In their ruling on Tuesday, judges said that the secretary of state was relying on a "departmental circular" to implement policy ordered by the courts in March last year, which was not sufficient.
"
The secretary of state has no business considering whether to introduce regulations to conform housing benefit provision with the judgment in Gorry. He is obliged to do so."..."
http://www.theguardian.com/society/2013/jul/30/bedroom-tax-legal-high-court
I wonder if the new presence of UKIP councillors locally has led to improvements?
Ignorance is bliss, bliss is happiness, I am happy...to draw your attention to the possible connectivity in the foregoing.