The post you are reporting:
Practical Function
Which advantages derive from sharing taxes and revenues among various Councils and the national Treasury, in a way that thirty percent of these go to the latter, and in having a Court of Economy protecting local Council economy boards in their economic prerogatives?
The answer is that, it's better for a board of people with a given Council budget to follow up the economic situation within their limited boundary, where the farms and factories are, and intervene where necessary to prevent bankruptcy and unemployment, than for a group of politicians to establish enormous centralised budgets in a secluded city, surrounded by world-bankers and company share-holders who work on figures and easy profits. They lose contact with all economic reality and uphold laws leading to unemployment and national deficit, and then hand over economic legislation to an alien parliament trying to reign over all Europe and Britain, totally destroying economy, and then flooding some bankrupt countries with millions of workers and immigrants from other countries as a final touch.
When hundreds of factories close down and transfer production to foreign countries owing to insane monetary and trade policies, and tens of thousands of families are evicted from their homes, millions of British citizens are without work, the public deficit - that mathematically can never be paid off - only increases, and more people are laid redundant, this is the result of government completely losing touch with reality, and then resigning national legislation to a centralised foreign parliament, which in turn responds with total bankruptcy, imported labour and mass immigration!
A Council economy board with a budget deriving from income drawn from its own production and tax, on the other hand, would be able to maintain production in its own factories and promote trade projects for the world market, choosing whichever continent and country might be in need of the production which their own area can offer.
It could prevent the local free trade productivity being bought up by company directors seated in some distant city brandishing cheques from banks which lent Britain's saved money to any company in the world in the name of world banking and easy-crop profits that, inevitably, turn sour and lead to the very banks going bankrupt. It's better for local councillors speaking the English language and the local accent to see that production in their own boundaries is preserved and that the resident British citizens are trained and entitled to participate in the economy.
Twenty councillors seeing to it that two or three factories with economic difficulties in their area remain in production are more likely to do a better job than twenty politicians in a city trying to manage the whole Nation's bankrupt economy and then handing over legislation to an alien parliament abroad which tries to manage the economies of twenty-seven countries! People managing large sums of money usually don't know how to plant a tree or pick an apple, have never seen a factory from within, and work on papers full of impossible figures. Board directors managing billions of pounds of a company's money and receiving millions of pounds salary and bonuses, often live in a world of their own, and probably spend more time figuring out how to spend their own income, and how to increase it, than how to invest the company's money in the national economy to the benefit of the people. There are of-course many exceptions, but not enough to avoid national bankruptcy.
With sixty percent of taxes and revenues going to District and County Councils and ten percent to Town Councils, the County would probably be able to take over responsibility for paying pensions, unemployment and housing benefit, sickness money and child benefit. The District Councils could add to this from their funds if the County budget proved insufficient, meaning there would be funds to fall upon to cover a local County budget deficit without incurring into national State deficit, which has no funds to draw upon, having already taken almost all the Nation's revenues. Furthermore, the County and District Councils would be able to pay all the local civil servants.
The thirty percent of taxes and revenues going to the State Treasury would be sufficient to cover NHS, and would also constitute a reserve to invest in any Counties having local financial problems, to cover their annual budgets where necessary, and to develop local agriculture and small-scale industry in these Counties.
The Court of Economy would also have the constitutional authority to ensure that banks invest sufficient sums of the Country's saved money in the Nation's economy. It would furthermore have the authority to intervene in order to prevent home-evictions of British citizens in financial plight, presiding over a fund established for this reason, with faculties to revise bank loans without home-owners having to remortgage their properties at unfavourable and often hopeless conditions.
The Court of Economy, in preserving the economic Constitution, would ensure that District Councils needn't depend on government Revenue Support Grants, and that every County can rely on its own Districts for financial support to cover, wherever necessary, the social welfare services within their responsibility.
The Garden of England, the Shires and all Counties would be able to work for economic prosperity and enjoy the fruits of their work, and maintain the national cohesion of our Country, free from imported labour and colonisation, for us British People to enjoy our Freedom!