The post you are reporting:
Of course it is 'true', but it is more of a truism than a factual account, that as 'we' can slope off and reside in mainland Europe and those from the mainland can come here.
Much as a Black Cab, is so called because it is a cab and it is black, and that Cheese tastes 'cheesy', because it is cheese.
All obvious, but a mite thin on the detail.
But, as usual, the very Devil is in the detail.
How 'right' things seem is for each to decide for themselves. 'We' are free to extract wealth from our own economy and take it off and distribute it in the economy of another EU State;
doing-up a run down Château, farmhouse-come-L' Auberge, time-share holiday home or retirement villa etc.
Yet, each of things is an example of an investment of 'new money', delivering wealth-creating opportunities and employment.
This is markedly different from 'economic migrant workers' coming here (or anywhere else in the EU) to abstract wealth, and to have a thoroughly negative effect upon 'wealth creation and employment' for the natives of the host State.
However, there is none so smug as those whose smug runs deep.
It is also possible for any citizen of the EU to migrate and to stand for election to the Legislature of their respective host State.
What depth of 'smug' comes into play then?
What might be made of 'Constituency connection' in arguing against such a PPC?
It's a bit like shouting "FIRE!" in a battlefield trench, as long as you don't care whether your audience is burned to a crisp while they mistakenly shoot across no-man's land, it does not matter, you'll have your sincerity to feel smug about.