• The post you are reporting:
   
  My understanding is that, if we are in public, our images are public property. Otherwise CCTV and cellphone pics would be inadmissable as evidence and they are not, if they are supported by other evidence. Slebs are papped all the time in public and can do SFA about it, why not crims? In addition, and in my view reprehensibly, the local press have been known to snap people leaving court after conviction and pasting it all over their papers, thus at a stroke adding to the already considered sentence and punishment meted out quite properly by the courts. They are not challenged or sued over it.

Report Post

Your Name

Reason