Fully agree with that Peter. The thing is that the alarmists make up their ideas and predictions on the hoof and when the climate doesn't appear to concur with their computer models they conveniently fail to report this or worse they explain this by blaming Man-made climate change.
As an example you might remember this from 2001:
http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/snowfalls-are-now-just-a-thing-of-the-past-724017.html
Well I don't know about you but for the past few winters it's snowed extremely heavily over the UK.
Next they blame global warming for the flooding We saw over the past few years Unfortunately our life span is limited to a relatively small amount of years so most people will not remember these examples affecting just one river over the centuries:
http://www.severntales.co.uk/severn-floods-3.html
It goes on and on and on. The same old same old and every time environmentalists insist they have proof of their belief (hurricane Sandy, the Australian floods, the Australian bushfires, cold weather, warm weather, Kilimanjaro peaks melting, blah, blah blah) their assertions are soundly rebuffed by sensible people.
However such is their deep seated belief that even when faced with the truth they lash out and hate you and try to ridicule. Check out any comments section to these stories in the Guardian environmental section. It's bedlam.
As an aside why is it that the i BBC Daily politics South east programme always includes a story featuring arch eco-warrior Caroline Lucas whose party holds on one seat in Parliament.
Bizarre isn't it?