Login / Register
D
o
v
e
r
.uk.com
News
Forums
Dover Forum
General Discussion Forum
Politics Forum
Archive Updates
Channel Swimming Forum
Doverforum.com: Sea News
Channel Swimming
History Archive
Calendar
Channel Traffic
If this post contains material that is offensive, inappropriate, illegal, or is a personal attack towards yourself, please report it using the form at the end of this page.
All reported posts will be reviewed by a moderator.
The post you are reporting:
Nobody suggested there was anything intrinsically wrong with either meat or milk, or indeed, anything wrong with the moderate consumption of same.
All things in moderation. Is that not true?
There is no longer an industry the purpose of which is to feed the nation. [there are some small enterprises, but we are talking mass-market here]
It is all about the bottom line...
The more meat & milk produced the more waste has to be disposed of. What better way of squaring this circle than reducing waste by re-packaging it as 'tasty morsels'?
The food that is cheap and (chemically) tasty is the food most consumed by those overweight. ergo There are greater numbers of fatties amongst the growing number of poor, but less waste and more profit.
Is chocolate consumed for it's health benefits or more likely because it (somehow) tastes good? This is what is exploited to the nth degree in the re-packaging of meat & milk by-products. To reduce 'fatties' we must reduce 'by-products' to reduce by-products we must reduce the production of meat & milk.
If you wish to be provided with a plentiful and ever-ready supply of meat & milk then get over the loathing of fatties, for they suffer FOR you.
Report Post
Your Name
Reason
end link