• The post you are reporting:
   
  DHB have been put under utmost pressure to produce by DfT, they will do so very soon now. The Government is losing patience with DHB. Certainly Charlie did not proceed with yesterday evening's adjournment in a fit of impatience, just another part of the ongoing consultation process and keeping the spotlight on Dover in order to ensure that the final decision and settlement of ownership is the right one for our communities and for the nation.
  
  DPPT is unlikely to fade away anytime soon, especially as the membership continues to grow.
  
  Neither the DPPT or the Bishop view themselves or each other as being on opposite sides. Both are acting for and on behalf of the common community that they serve and have been set up to serve. When the DHB fails in its attempt to privatise the port and sell it to remote private equity, I am sure that the Bishop, the appointees to the PDCT and DPPT will be able to work together and pool our progress to date on regeneration matters to the great benefit of Dover and Dover District.
  
  I suggest that you reread the transcript a bit more carefully leaving aside the wee joke at the end. There are some very important pointers there that will show how much the people of Dover have already changed government attitudes with regards to ownership of the port by the community.

Report Post

Your Name

Reason