Login / Register
D
o
v
e
r
.uk.com
News
Forums
Dover Forum
General Discussion Forum
Politics Forum
Archive Updates
Channel Swimming Forum
Doverforum.com: Sea News
Channel Swimming
History Archive
Calendar
Channel Traffic
If this post contains material that is offensive, inappropriate, illegal, or is a personal attack towards yourself, please report it using the form at the end of this page.
All reported posts will be reviewed by a moderator.
The post you are reporting:
Phil, Rev. Puckle wasn't being polemical towards the Romans, he only meant to say that the period in which he believes the foundations and church date to is about the fourth century AD, and assumes that local people - Britons - carried out the work using Roman-style foundation-laying and architecture.
The tiles I refer to are not roof-tiles, but narrow bricks placed above some of the windows in an arc-style, and which, because of their being so narrow, resemble tiles. It is a typically Roman-style way of building.
But glad to know that you have not categorically excluded that the Church might be from that period.
Once again, if you get to know anything about this possibility, and may-be the Council does a kind of archaeoligical inquiery, let us know!
Report Post
Your Name
Reason
end link