• The post you are reporting:
   
  Paul, I feel that the Autumn statement is evidence enough. Surely the capping of benefits in relation to inflation (inflation, by defintion, making it a cut) is an example of prejudice in itself - a pre judgement based on an ignorant assumption of a lifestyle.
  
  Perhaps prejudice is acceptable if you have money?
  
  If Mr Cameron/Osborune can generalise, then surely these assumptions can be inverted, it would be undemocratic to suggest otherwise?
  
  Of course I would be happy to claim ignorance, providing we could also write off the decisions of our government (past and present) as ignorant.
  
  Prejudice is unfortunately prevalent in our society and not always negative. We must for instance hold a preconceived outlook (positve or negative) towards the HoL or the Royal Family; unless we start to site tradition as justification, in which case I suggest that any response to this post be sent to me via stagecoach.

Report Post

Your Name

Reason