• The post you are reporting:
   
  Gary:
  
  The reason i start with benefits is this.
  
  There are people that lose their job and quite rightly the state should be the safety net to look after them. If you've worked why shouldn't the state look after you until you get a job.
  
  But should the state be there for somebody who has not worked in 5 years or who has never worked at all?
  
  Should the state prop up those that have 2, 3 or 4 children (while unemployed for the whole time)?
  
  You should never be better off by not working and this needs to be put right.
  
  Your pride should make you want to work.
  
  What was the welfare system set up for? The genuine or those who have never worked?

Report Post

Your Name

Reason