The post you are reporting:
Keith S, your post 3 reads:
"You will recall Howard Alexander was under the impression the Christchurch church on Folkestone Road was closed by the council, just trying to help, church's are closed by Church Councils, those running the church's nothing to do with local authorities".
I never suggested, Keith, the Council closed this church in Folkestone Road.
My point was that the Council signed a piece of paper allowing it to be ripped down and the land to be developed with flats.
Although you are right that Church heads are responsible for their decisions.
As you may know, Christchurch in Folkestone Road was C/E, and as the queen is considered the head of the C/E, she is ultimately responsible for the demolishing of the church dedicated to Christ, a church that was in excellent condition.
Because YOU brought up the point of Christchurch in Folkestone Road in post 3 and made reference to me, I have given you an appropriate reply in various posts here.
If someone is considered the head of Christchurch and bears the title Defender of the Faith, but then allows Christ's Church to be ripped down and the land sold for money money money, while living the life of Riley in palaces, then certainly that title no longer refers to them.
I saw it from the point of view of the Fair Lady, whose Church, in the East - West line of the rising and setting sun, indicates the road leading to Christ's Church in Folkestone Road.
There was no Christ Church left, only the foundations and the original plan.
So I asked: who was the head of this church?, and on ascertaining it was the queen, as it was part of the C/E, I concluded she is not Defender of the Faith.
I also took into account that she lives in many palaces on many estates and manages vast sums of personal money for personal use.
It's too late now, Keith, C/E Christ's Church is gone and the queen is not the head of this Church.
