The post you are reporting:
My Dear Alexander, read previous postings on this subject or get a better memory (Howard, you have no Goldfish Smilies). I explained to you before that the stress tested business plan and financials included a £100m spend over 5 years on catch up maintenance and capital investment. In order for the Government Criteria to be met, the TREASURY must achieve 'Fair Value'. I thought you knew all about everything to do with ports Alexander and everything to do with the Ports Act and the Public Bodies Act, it is clear that all monies go to The Treasury - where else did you think they might go? If the port is going to be communitised and re-created as a friendly Mutual society, then the Government have to achieve fair value. I am saying nothing new here.
The facebook page appears to work from my end and some people have commented on the page in the past, but I'm no Social Media Officianado, FB is not my thing, so possibly something not working that I don't know about.
As I've said before to you, rail links to ports are nothing new, they are a long established method of connecting ports to their wider hinterland (Port-Rail connectivity has been around for as long as rail has been). I'm sure that everyone on this forum who has a better memory than you will remember that, as a port professional, I mentioned once or twice that rail connectivity would be among DPPT considerations when reviewing the Port Masterplan. Intellectual theft of such an idea is impossible as it is not your intellectual property, best have a word or two with Brunel andd see if he'll grant you full rights over what were originally his ideas.
