The post you are reporting:
Paul, while maintaining that DPPT have not presented a shred of evidence that their "trust" is being taken into consideration by the Government - I personally believe it isn't - I am convinced that sooner or later, a Government will decide that local Port Communities in Britain receive a revenue from port traffic.
I did send a copy of my representation to a UKIP office some months back, towards the end of last year, during a phase of reciprocal contact, and as I have for several years underlined my support for UKIP on various general issues and my preference for this party, perhaps a change of Government could see my proposals being accepted.
Until such time, we won't have any meaningful investment for economic regeneration in Dover District.
Not only, but people will realise even more that the idea of a debt-based asset, such as Dover Port, incurring a £400 million debt as planned by DPPT, will be utterly out of the question.
Debt-based assets, and debt-ridden banks and budgets, and public debts and debt-based currencies are all falling to pieces internationally.
A £400 million debt on an asset (the Port of Dover) in a district of 100,000 people, would be the equivalent of Britain, with about 60 million people, taking on a new debt of £240 billion.
If calculated to Dover town's 30,000 people, that figure would rise to £800 billion.
Yet Dover town and district already are participant in the existing £1 trillion National Debt.
Oh and Paul, don't think that DPPT will manage, with all their claimed contacts with ministers, lords and civil servants, with Tory party politicians and with Labour politicians, to involve UKIP in their idea: because they won't.