• The post you are reporting:
   
  UNEMPLOYMENT.
  
  If, for the sake of argument, the UK (Plc, the economy etc.,whatever you wish to call it) Is a cottage in the forest.
  
  There is a fire-place and a cooking range, and the ambient temperature can fluctuate wildly from hot to cold.
  
  Should the occupiers of the cottage use good-husbandry to sustain the woodland around them in order to be assured of a ready supply of fuel when the mercury is low?
  Or is it more wise to fell the trees and stack the fuel nearby?
  
  It strikes me that the latter course is the preferred option. The forest is denied a life of it's own. It's single purpose is seen to be as conveniently ready for use as fuel as can be. That at some stage the fuel is seen to have rotted away, that is (somehow, anyhow) seen as the fault of the fuel itself.
  If it does not wish to be of use, then let it rot!
  
  We must as a Nation (Democratic entity) strive to sustain what we have and follow our course with this 'Fact' at the forefront of our minds instead of turning all energy to provide ease for the few.

Report Post

Your Name

Reason