Brian Dixon
- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
#1
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
#2
his poll ratings show that he has very little of the female vote and hopes this patronising move will improve things.
Jan Higgins
- Location: Dover
- Registered: 5 Jul 2010
- Posts: 13,931
#3
I wonder if he is kicked out will Ken Clarke sue for ageism like the awful John McCririck.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
I try to be neutral and polite but it is hard and getting even more difficult at times.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Guest 1033- Registered: 23 Aug 2013
- Posts: 509
#4
Should have tried sueing for 'stupidism', would have stood a much better chance.
Guest 716- Registered: 9 Jun 2011
- Posts: 4,010
#5
It really should be who is best for the job.
Guest 698- Registered: 28 May 2010
- Posts: 8,664
#6
Here come a few sweeping generalisations.
Women are very often the best candidates but tend not to talk themselves up as much as men do.
Women work more assiduously on the job and are less easily distracted than men.
Women care more about the quality of their work.
Women moan less about pay and conditions.
Women follow instructions better and are less likely to take silly risks.
In my career in the City I never, ever, had to send a woman home for coming back the worse for wear after lunch.
Interesting though, that the last PM to preside over an all male cabinet was Maggie.
I'm an optimist. But I'm an optimist who takes my raincoat - Harold Wilson
Brian Dixon- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
#7
Brian Dixon- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
#8