• The post you are reporting:
   
  When I spoke at a planning meeting (Sue and Pam were both on the committee so should remember) the chairman allowed more than one speaker against a particular application - just happened that one of them was an MP though I'm sure that had no bearing!
  
  Whoever speaks it is important they stick to the facts of the case and don't just push the emotional attachment of thousands of residents to the pier - the change from T2 to DWDR is purely a temporary measure to comply with the time limit set for the development permission, the decision not to require an Environmental Impact Assessment for the change was taken by an officer with no consultation or reference to the planning committee, there is no guarantee that the removed heritage items will be replaced or where and to place them out of context would lose their value anyway, the various DDC policies that this plan would go against etc, etc.

Report Post

Your Name

Reason